Michigan Election Results:
(Nader got 2322 write-in votes in Michigan,
and even did better than the Natural Law Party in Washtenaw County)
[
Full results - Bureau of Elections]
[
How to "Write-In" Nader/LaDuke on your ballot]
Michigan Press Releases: [9/6/96] [6/20/96], [ Detroit News (blech!) Nader article 6/20/96]
National Info:
[Some Nader Interviews]
[
Winona LaDuke's VP Acceptance Speech, 8/29/96]
Why would Ralph Nader run for President? on the Green Party ticket??
Nader and the Greens (and many other Americans) want to bring some seriously neglected issues into the presidential debate. The most basic of these is the need for a true democracy of the people, by the people, and for the people, rather than of the rich, by the media, and for the multi-national corporations and their prime stockholders.
He, like the rest of us, is tired of the "two-party two-step," both parties trying to make it look like they're pushing in different directions, while actually moving in lock-step in the same direction. And while we and the media are supposedly hypnotized with the elegance or excitement of their dance, they figure they can get away with avoiding discussion of critical issues that never really come up in their campaign propaganda. Why does the fact that corporate welfare is much larger than programs for the poor never come up in the two-party "debate" (except from a radical like Pat Buchanan?)
Why would Nader run for President on the Green Party ticket??
Nader: "Real decentralization would include something like this: You could
have public financing of federal elections based on voluntary check-offs on
tax returns. This could easily raise the $300 million to $400 million
needed for congressional campaigns every two years. There's no better way
to decentralize power than to make sure people's votes are not nullified by
special-interest dollars." [Rolling Stone magazine, November 16, 1995]
On a Phil Donahue interview in New Hampshire just before the Republican
primary in Feb '96, Ralph Nader spoke of how willing the typical American
is to put hard work into researching the purchase of a new car or major
appliance, but when it comes to picking a presidential candidate, we often
treat it more like choosing an ice cream flavor -- like what sound-bite
sounds the most tasty today. We really need to do the work ourselves or at
least dig up the publications of people who really do look into the records
and funding sources of the person who will be a major force in shaping the
future of our lives for at least the next four years. And as we should
see, the actions during a four year term can have substantial
longer-lasting effects, for better or worse. If our next president does
not follow through with the beginnings of a move toward a balanced budget,
the debt will get even more astronomical that it already is, and more and
more of our tax dollars will simply go to the investors who are able to
purchase that debt, including foreign corporations.
It used to be that 3rd party candidates drew many more votes from the
Democrats than from Republicans. With increasingly widespread voter
distrust, disillusionment, and apathy of the past few years this has
changed significantly. According to
an analysis of the "Perot effect" on voter response, the draw of a
viable third party is now roughly equal from both Republicans and Democrats.
Once disaffected Republicans realize the populist nature of the Nader
campaign, they should be at least as enthusiastic as Democrats in their
support.
To quote Ralph:
"What the government should have done years ago is offer a $50 million
prize to the first company that produced a minimally polluting car suitable
for mass production. That's how Napoleon got canned food. He offered a
prize for a way to get food that could be carriedd across Europe without
spoiling."
This is also how we got much more efficient refrigerators -- utility
companies offered a $30 million prize.
The "four pillars" of the Greens are:
Ralph Nader was a major driving force in the early days of the
environmental movement and specifically the creation of the Environmental
Protection Agency. Since then, his Public Citizen groups have helped
keep corporate polluters accountable for their atrocities to our health
and the well-being of our eco-system.
This is the prime focus of Ralph Nader's campaign.
This does not mean merely getting people to vote, but getting them to take
responsibility for the whole election process, including learning the
issues, and being able to put forward their own candidates, rather than
relying on the entrenched political parties and the corporate-owned media
to tell them what and whom their choices are.
Other Questions & Answers
"...there are certain things that have to be national standards. You can't
have 50 states experimenting with truck-brake standards."
[3rd Party Viability]
[Nader Interviews]
[National Greens Clearinghouse]
Green Party of Michigan
548 S Main St
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-663-3555
[http://ic.net/~harvey/greens]
or
[
http://www.ocean.ic.net/users/randym]
Accesses since 6/2/96
last modified 4 Nov 1999